It is currently Sat May 23, 2026 5:12 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
 Post subject: 600 Volt or Less testing / monitoring
PostPosted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:20 am 

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:09 am
Posts: 2
Are there any new Code requirements for 600V or less motor control centers, that require engineeering practices to prevent or keep a technician from having to be exposed to energized starter/breaker when performing task such as troubleshooting or monitoring?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:56 am 
Sparks Level

Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:59 pm
Posts: 72
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Triton45 wrote:
Are there any new Code requirements for 600V or less motor control centers, that require engineeering practices to prevent or keep a technician from having to be exposed to energized starter/breaker when performing task such as troubleshooting or monitoring?


There are not any codes or standards that require this sort of isolation during troubleshooting, although some companies have internal standards moving in this direction. There is one relevant IEEE document that is currently in the draft stage - IEEE 1683 "Guide for Motor Control Centers Rated Up To and Including 600 Vac or 1000 Vdc with Requirements Intended to Reduce Electrical Hazards While Performing Defined Operations."

There are a number of suggestions in IEEE 1683 related to your question:
- Consider using a control voltage less than 50V to reduce the hazard to troubleshooting control circuits
- Consider use of test power so that the primary voltage can be isolated from the compartment while troubleshooting the control circuit.
- Consider use of insulated bus in all practical locations.
- Consider use of shutters wherever practical to isolate personnel and tools from live parts
- Consider use of "finger safe" components wherever possible
- Consider maximizing the use of "arc free zones", which are defined as areas where it is not possible to install a fuse wire to initiate an arc. A high percentage of arc flash incidents are initiated by humans, and by insulating or guarding live parts such that it's not possible to install a fuse wire we can decrease the probability of initiating an incident.

This is off the top of my head right now, I'm sure there are a number of things I'm forgetting. The goal is to finalize IEEE 1683 by the Electrical Safety Workshop in late January 2012 and publish the guide in 2012.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022-2025 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883